(Tim) Following links to Baylyblog, I found this on a radical two-kingdom blog and place it here as another indication of the nature of this error and the motivations of those who hold it. The R2K blogger is addressing two questions asked by an R2K opponent. The second question ends like this: "...why are (R2K) folks so upset when people like the Bayly brothers preach sermons on highly politicized topics like abortion?"
Here's the R2K man's answer...
...the concern of two kingdom [radical two kingdom] ecclesiology and the subsequent doctrine of the spirituality of the church is for the unfettered gospel. (We don't) want anybody unduly alienated from the gospel by any tradition of men, up to and including any man’s politics. I continue to be puzzled as to why any of this should be so controversial or perplexing amongst those who conceive themselves as theologically conservative, unless we have made relative peace with the progressive spirit of the age.
And this is what all the upset is over the Bayly’s glorified rightist political speech: it goes a fair distance to alienate people from the gospel, every bit as much as any glorified leftist political screed from MLK’s pulpit in the 60s. People who don’t have rightist or leftist or middlist politics, or like me who are politically agnostic, stand a very real chance of being sufficiently alienated from the gospel when its wagon is hitched up to any political or social star.
