Brothers Bayly

« Early Church Fathers and John Calvin on women in civil and military realms... | Main | Brian McLaren exposed by a Stupak question... »

Saturday, 14 November 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d09d69e2012875a1cf15970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Idolatry of the state: the thunderheads gather...:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I just picked up "Idols for Destruction" today!

Along with 9 other books including Weaver's, "Ideas have Consequences" and Macheb's, "Christianity and Liberalism".

Cool day!

Kamilla

Even those of us who are not postmillenialists cringe at the idea of Christians practicing State worship. Wait until the State tells Christian pastors what they can and cannot preach; it's coming, and I suspect, a lot sooner than we think.

There are few books that I've read that I can say have actually altered the way I looked at things. I read Schlossberg's book when it came out in '83 and it did just that. Equally good--perhaps better, with a slightly different emphasis is Rushdoony's "Christianity and the State." Both men were visionaries, and what they warned against two and a half decades ago is coming to full fruition right before our eyes. Both men are/were postmillennialists (Rushdoony is gone now) and I know of no intelligent postmillennialists who believe that these things can't/won't happen. They ARE happening.

It is the fault of the church. Covenantally ignorant, steeped in pietism, antinomianism, and eschatological pessimism it long ago abandoned its cultural responsibilities to the secularists. The light is under the bushel and the salt has lost its savor. There is no guiding illumination, there is no preservative. When Christians withdraw from any area it creates a vacuum and the universe abhors a vacuum. Another god will fill that vacuum and it is invariably autonomous man in the form of the state. We are getting exactly what we deserve.

Make no mistake, the church will one day open its eyes to its responsibility to conquer every area of this world for Christ. How many times it has to be brought to its knees in repentance for its failure to do that is what remains to be seen. I know of no examples of a society given over to the worship of Molech, (child sacrifice in the form of abortion) and sodomy that recovered. We fear that God will judge this country for those things when those things ARE God's judgment.

I need to get off the soapbox. Dear God be merciful, open the eyes of your people and grant us repentance.

Dear Mark,

That was positively pastoral, dear brother. Thank you.

Love,

> So, from birth to grave... Or rather, from conception (abortion) to brain cessation (organ harvesting), we will belong, not to ourselves, but to Caesar.

The gladiatorial line "Hail, Caesar! We who are about to die salute you" may also become appropriate in this context.

Tim Bayly: "Recently, I've been explaining to younger believers that we must beware the idolatry of the state--particularly now when so many are crying out for Washington D.C. to heal them."

I wasn't aware that younger believers were/are crying out for statism. Are you sure? Maybe a few.

Mark Chambers: "Make no mistake, the church will one day open its eyes to its responsibility to conquer every area of this world for Christ."

I've just started reading some material about 1K vs. 2K theology. A hot debate topic. Both have strengths, both have weaknesses.

Some things where the church too often compromises with Caesar--and yes, the young are taking part.

1. By flying a flag higher than the cross.
2. Saying the Pledge of Allegiance at AWANA events--or any church event. (sorry, it's neither Constitutional nor Biblical)
3. Fourth of July musicales.

Some would even add 501C3 registration and such.

>Both have strengths, both have weaknesses.

Heh. I don't think so.

> Saying the Pledge of Allegiance at AWANA events--or any church event.

Should individual Christians even participate in saying it at non-church events?

Is the pledge being said about something that is even accurate [a "republic" / "one nation under God"] or desirable ["indivisible"]? Will there really be "liberty and justice" for Christians who refuse to bow to the State-imposed religion?

By mouthing this, are we not pretending something is true that isn't? Isn't it participating in a form of brainwashing, helping us to believe a lie?

My personal inclination is to pray for *divisibility* so that a nation under God might perhaps be possible once more. Blindly pledging indivisibility is no virtue in the current situation.

The entire Emergent movement's promotion of Barack Obama is integrally bound up with stateism, and that movement is huge among young evangelicals. They find Rob Bell and Brian McLaren answer the questions of their hearts, as one Columbia International University graduate put it to me.

Love,

Tim Bayly: "The entire Emergent movement's promotion of Barack Obama is integrally bound up with stateism, and that movement is huge among young evangelicals."

Oh.

It's funny/odd/weird/ironic. The younger evangelicals or Emergers do the very thing they criticize then. For they criticize "The Religious Right" for being too intertwined with political conservativism, specifically the Republican Party.

And then they go and do the same, but opposite thing by aligning with the political left's agenda.

FWIW, I'm a Bible-believing Christian *first*. I only vote GOP the vast majority of the time because they're the only ones who have a viable chance of stopping the liberal-leftist agenda/platform (which include both abortion and gay marriage). It's not so much pro-GOP (or politics) that drives me, it's more about stopping the destructive socio-political-cultural-family agenda/platform of the liberal-left.

Dear TUAD,

I agree with every last word you just wrote.

Love,

>It's not so much pro-GOP (or politics) that drives me, it's more about stopping the destructive socio-political-cultural-family agenda/platform of the liberal-left.

Dear TUAD,

Hemlock is not nearly as fast as cyanide, but it is every bit as deadly. Statism is anti Christ whatever the flavor or speed at which is marches. The only cure for government debauchery is the conversion of the people who then recognize the responsibility of the state, as well as the church and family, to rule by and in submission to God's Word and Law.

Peace

C.S. Lewis's Screwtape Letters ring in mind in this case. The devil always seeks to make us a patriot or a radical but ultimately the goal is to blind us from Christ. This "twenty-something" is thankful for the wisdom here.

I am postmillenial and for all I know the United States may be destined for the dustbin of history. While I personally believe that repentance and restoration are still in our future it cannot be denied that these are Ichabod times.

I must question though, as to the degree of persecution that sixty million Evangelicals with resort to arms may be reasonably expected to submit.

You know Don we really need to get together.

Personally I am not sure that most Evangelicals pose any fundamental threat at all to statists.

Mark,

I would like that very much. I'll have Jeanne call Melanie. I hope you like venison.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Joe Bayly's books

Top ten reading on sex

Send Tim an e-mail

Wikipedia Affiliate Button

Site Meter