(Tim) Along with several others, Ruling Elder Brian Eschen of
Northern California (NorCal) Presbytery submitted a complaint which was one of two filed against the
recent action of his presbytery approving unordained male deacons serving alongside female deacons, without
sexual distinction.
The proposal adopted by NorCal Presbytery is
the same proposal recently adopted by Metro NY and Metro Atlanta
(Perimeter) Presbyteries.
In response to another complaint filed against Metro NY Presbytery, last week the presbytery rescinded the proposal, but granted only one of five amends. It may be further amends will be granted as time passes, but the well-established practice within the presbytery's bounds of non-conformity to Scripture and the PCA's Constitution leave some doubtful any further amends will be granted without formal discipline applied from the national level of the denomination.
After voting down an overture on woman deacons that would have put the
presbytery on record as submitting to the PCA's Constitution and
Scripture, two other proposals were voted on, with the pro-woman deacon
proposal adopted by NCal and Metro NY getting 19 votes and another
proposal presented to the presbytery by Steve Smallman and Phil Ryken
that supports Tenth's current practice of women deaconesses getting 23.
The Ryken/Smallman proposal was acted on with the understanding that Steve and Phil would come back to the Presbytery's May stated meeting
with their proposal perfected for final action. Then, the matter was tabled.
So New York,
Philadelphia, Atlanta, and San Francisco continue to be the
geographical centers of egalitarian feminist practices and initiatives within the PCA related to the removal of sexual distinctions in the office of deacon. Men from these presbyteries worked together toward
the adoption of the same document (although there were some
regional differences in their approach).
Although some would cavil at this, the rejection of the
Book of Church Order at the heart of this proposal and the presbyteries' recent actions seems self-evident and would appear only to be remediable by changes to the BCO. It's also clear that, at the present time, the main thrust of these co-belligerents is not seeking redress at the national level. Rather, for the time being they appear to be turning aside from changing the Book of Church Order nationally or denominationally.
Their proposal and work seem to be moving toward a local option strategy similar to the
strategy adopted by the pro-sodomy lobby of the PC(USA)...